Friendpaste

--- Revision None
+++ Revision 333366356235
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+Python 2.6.6 (r266:84292, Sep 15 2010, 15:52:39) 
+[GCC 4.4.5] on linux2
+Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
+>>> import this
+The Zen of Python, by Tim Peters
+
+Beautiful is better than ugly.
+Explicit is better than implicit.
+Simple is better than complex.
+Complex is better than complicated.
+Flat is better than nested.
+Sparse is better than dense.
+Readability counts.
+Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules.
+Although practicality beats purity.
+Errors should never pass silently.
+Unless explicitly silenced.
+In the face of ambiguity, refuse the temptation to guess.
+There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it.
+Although that way may not be obvious at first unless you're Dutch.
+Now is better than never.
+Although never is often better than *right* now.
+If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad idea.
+If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a good idea.
+Namespaces are one honking great idea -- let's do more of those!
a	b
	0	+	Python 2.6.6 (r266:84292, Sep 15 2010, 15:52:39)
	0	+	[GCC 4.4.5] on linux2
	0	+	Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
	0	+	>>> import this
	0	+	The Zen of Python, by Tim Peters
	0	+
	0	+	Beautiful is better than ugly.
	0	+	Explicit is better than implicit.
	0	+	Simple is better than complex.
	0	+	Complex is better than complicated.
	0	+	Flat is better than nested.
	0	+	Sparse is better than dense.
	0	+	Readability counts.
	0	+	Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules.
	0	+	Although practicality beats purity.
	0	+	Errors should never pass silently.
	0	+	Unless explicitly silenced.
	0	+	In the face of ambiguity, refuse the temptation to guess.
	0	+	There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it.
	0	+	Although that way may not be obvious at first unless you're Dutch.
	0	+	Now is better than never.
	0	+	Although never is often better than right now.
	0	+	If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad idea.
	0	+	If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a good idea.
	0	+	Namespaces are one honking great idea -- let's do more of those!
...